Annotated Bibliography



Works Cited
American Civil Liberties Union
www.aclu.org

               The American Civil Liberties Union is an organization dedicated to the protection of citizen’s Constitutional rights. Their website is their main outlet for providing detailed information about their most current projects and cases.


ACLU.  “Racial Profiling: Definition.”  http://www.aclu.org/racial-justice/racial-profiling-definition.  November 23, 2005.  Web.  2 Nov. 2012.


              The ACLU is instrumental in pursuing injustices and bringing to light the wrongdoings of authorities and government.  The site is an enormous resource, covering cases of racial profiling and unconstitutional actions that go against individuals protected civil liberties and rights.  Their definition of racial profiling is one of the most thorough and inclusive.


Altheide, David.  “Terrorism and the Politics of Fear,” Social Problems, Charon and Vigilant, 2009, pp.538-544. 
         
        Altheide’s peer reviewed journal article discusses on the origins of “The War of Terror” after September 11, 2001, citing examples of media propaganda, the politics of fear, and the process through which individuals are willing to give up their own rights for “collective security,” even though most are ignorant to the injustices that occur because this type of thinking becomes normalized.


Arab American Institute.  http://www.aaiusa.org/. and http://aai.3cdn.net/e64a3016cae546cd4f_4em6bxluo.pdf  . n.p. Web. 5 Nov. 2012


              The Arab American Institute (AAI) is a nonprofit organization committed to the civic and political empowerment of Americans of Arab descent.  They represent policy and community interests of Arab Americans throughout the U.S., as well as provide research and support on current issues; one of those being the targeting through racial profiling post 9/11.  Closely affiliated with the AAI is the AAIF which serves as the primary national resource on the Arab American experience for the media, academia, government agencies and the private sector.


Bhardwaj, Sandeep. "Cyber Terrorism: Threat Exaggerated?" http://www.ipcs.org. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, Web. Accessed 12 November 2012.  http://www.ipcs.org/article/terrorism/cyber-terrorism-threat-exaggerated-2659.html
    
         This article examines the true threat the United States has against a cyberterrorist attack. It explains the nuances and techniques of hacker groups and their perceived effect. Sandeep Bhardwaj is a Research Officer for the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies. This organization is interested in developing an alternative framework for peace and security in the United States. This article helped explain how cyber terrorists dissemninate information amongst themselves. It also helped explain how much interfering with communications technology has become more on a national security concern.
                                                                                                                                                      Bovard, James. "Surveillance State." The American Conservative. 19 May 2003. http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/surveillance-state/.

         This article gives some pertinent information regarding the creation and motivation for the Patriot Act. Bovard goes into detail about exactly how the Act effects Americans. The author has written nine government related books, and also was done articles for NY Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, New Republic, and Reader’s Digest. In  2003 he won the Lysander Spooner Award for the Best Book on Liberty in 2003. This article gives some thoughtful insight and deep analysis of the Patriot Act that will help argue my point of view. 

Chang, Nancy. “The USA PATRIOT Act: What's So Patriotic About Trampling on the Bill of Rights?” Center for Constitutional Rights. http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/USAPAanalyze.html New York, November 2001. Web. 2, Nov. 2012. 

         Chang provides an overview on controversial provisions of the US Patriot Act.  She discusses the suspension of civil liberties, provides evidence of law enforcement evading  the 4th Amendment’s  requirement of probable cause in searches.  She also speaks about how the Act especially affects immigrants and citizens of Middle Eastern, African and Muslim decent.


Electronic Privacy Information Center
http://www.epic.org
http://epic.org/privacy/nsl/default.html

                 This website contains a wealth of information related to persona privacy and civil liberties issues. Its main purpose is to inform the public on growing concerns related to the First Amendment rights and protection of the constitution. They also provide large amounts of data about the use of NSLs  over the last thirty plus years.


Eggen, Dan. “Patriot Act Partly Blamed in Madrid Case.” The Washington Post. 11 March 2006. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/10/AR2006031002027.html

       This article describes the case of Brandon Mayfield versus the United States of America. The superior court ruled in Mayfield’s favor against the Patriot Act’s surveillance tactics used to search Mayfield’s personal belongings. Dan Eggen was part of a team that won a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting in 2002. This article will help support my stance that The Patriot Act has flaws.

Ferran, Lee, and Jason Ryan. "9/11 Flashback: US Flight Schools Still Unknowingly Training
Terrorists?" ABC News. ABC News Network, 18 July 2012. Web. 8 Nov. 2012.
<http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/911-flashback-us-flight-schools-unknowingly-training-
terrorists/story?id=16802116>



 This article provides information about the specific terrorists that carried out the September 11th attacks. It explains their training they received from American flight schools and their entrance into the country on student visas. Lee Ferran and Jason Ryan are both reporters for the internet version of abc news. From this article a specific example is illustrated supporting the new regulations of the Patriot Act.


Lynch, Timothy. "More Surveillance Equals Less Liberty: Patriot Act Reduces Privacy, Undercuts Judicial Review." CATO Institute. Web. 10 Sept. 2003. http://www.cato.org/research/articles/lynch-030910.html

          This article brings up the government’s reasoning behind the Patriot Act, and the way Section 215 creates a façade of judicial review. Although a court order is needed in order to search someone’s property, the judiciary cannot scrutinize the foundation for the Justice Department applications, and therefore does not have any say. Timothy Lynch is director of the Cato Institute’s Project on Criminal Justice. He earned both his B.S. and J.D. from Marquette University, and has published articles in the NY Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street Journal. This article gives an insightful point of view regarding judicial review.


Messerli, Joe. "Should We Sacrifice Some of Our Civil Liberties to Help Fight the War on Terror ?"BalancedPolitics.org. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.balancedpolitics.org/civil_liberties.htm>.

            This article brings up both sides of the debate whether the Patriot Act hurts more than it helps. Joe Messerli graduated from University of Wisconsin-Whitewater in 1996 with degrees in Finance and Management Computer System. This article will help for my naysayer part of the paper
.

Muslim Advocates.  “Losing Liberty: The State of Freedom 10 Years After the Patriot Act.”  Published October 2011.  www.muslimadvocates.org http://www.muslimadvocates.org/Losing_Liberty_The_State_of_Freedom_10_Years_After_the_PATRIOT_Act.pdf
  
              Muslim Advocates is a national legal advocacy and educational organization dedicated to promoting freedom, justice, and equality for all, regardless of faith, though legal advocacy, policy engagement, and civic education, and by serving as a legal resource to promote the full and meaningful participation of Muslims in American public life.


Podgor, Ellen . “Computer Crimes and the USA PATRIOT Act” Criminal Justice Magazine 17:2, Summer 2002. Web. Accessed 12 November 2012.
http://www.americanbar.org/publications/criminal_justice_magazine_home/crimjust_cjmag_17_2_crimes.htm
     
     This article explains how cyberterrorism is defined through the Patriot Act. It also describes the penalties to those who commit or attempt to commit computer crimes. Ellen Podgor is a Professor of Law at Georgia State University College of Law in Atlanta, Georgia. This article helped me explain the haste that the patriot act was passed. It also defined what protected computers were and what could be defined as an attack against a ‘protected computer’.

Raghavan, Tara. “In Fear of Cyberterrorism: An Analysis Of The Congressional Response” Journal Of Law, Technology & Policy Vol. 2003. Web. Accessed 12 November 2012.http://www.jltp.uiuc.edu/recdevs/raghavan.pdf

        This article describes the congressional response to cyberterrorism in the wake of the attacks on the World Trade Center on Septemember 11, 2011. It also explains the Cyber Security Research and Development Act and the problems associated with it. Tara Raghavan is a partner at Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik LLP. Her practice focuses on complex patent litigation, counseling and opinion work. This article helped me explain how the Patriot Act infringes on people’s civil liberties. It also helped me explain the scope of international terrorism in relation to cybercrimes.


Review of the FBI’s Use of National Security Letters: Assessment of Corrective Actions and Examination of NSL Usage in 2006
www.justice.gov
http://www.justice.gov/oig/special/s0803b/final.pdf

       This report is a filing by the Justice Department that details the findings of an investigation into the FBI’s use of NSLs in criminal investigations. It is empirical, unbiased, and provides nearly two hundred pages of detailed accounts of the legality and effectiveness of their execution.


Right to Financial Privacy Act (12 U.S.C. 3401 et seq.)
http://www.accessreports.com
http://www.accessreports.com/statutes/RFPA.htm

    The document is the piece of legislation that first established the National Security Letter as an investigative tool for law enforcement.


Siskin, Alison. Monitoring Goreign Students in the United States: The Student and Exchange
Visitor Information System (SEVIS). Library of Congress, CRS Report for    Congress. Congressional Research Service, 14 Jan. 2005. Web. 10 Nov. 2012.http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/44016.pdf

           This article describes the old provisions for monitoring foreign students and the new provisions enacted by the Patriot Act. It also discusses some of the issues that have come from the Act and its new rules and regulations. Alison Siskin is a Specialist in Immigration Policy and frequently prepares reports for the Congressional Research Service. The information in this article made it possible to see the rules and regulations before and after the Patriot Act.



"Surveillance Under the Patriot Act." American Civil Liberties Union. 24 Oct. 2011.
http://www.aclu.org/national-security/surveillance-under-patriot-act%20

            This visually stimulating article goes into the different methods of how authority’s surveillance over citizens has increased and/or changed. It also gives specific facts and number related to surveillance and terrorism. The ACLU sourced many of its findings from: justice.gov and senate.gov websites. These appear to be legitimate sources to me. I can use the facts and numbers from this site to help argue my point. These articles also give up to date information about the Patriot Act.


The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.  “Restoring a National Consensus: The Need to End Racial Profiling in America.”  March 2011. Washington DC.  www.civilrights.org

    The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights is an organization that engages in lobbying and legislative advocacy.  Founded in 1950 this coalition is made up of 200 plus national organizations, all with the goal to promote and protect civil and human rights, as well as equality for all persons in the US.  The specific sections used in this research included hypothetical examples of racial profiling in order to illustrate the definition.  From this site, this article was also used: “What is Racial Profiling” http://www.civilrights.org/publications/reports/racial-profiling2011/what-is-racial-profiling.html



U.S. Department of Justice. “Guidance Regarding the Use of Race By Federal Law Enforcement Agencies,” June 2003.  http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/split/documents/guidance_on_race.php

          Both this guidance outline and report of how the Patriot Act was being implemented and if was successful come from the U.S. Justice Department several years after 9/11.  In them they account for experiences, incidences, and lessons learned from use of the Patriot Act.  There are extensive sections on how to refrain from racial profiling, and targeting of specific individuals, as well as how to soften Americans’ outrage at the encroachment upon their constitutionally protected rights through Amendments like the 4th and the 14th


U.S. Department of Justice. “Report From the Field: USA Patriot Act at Work.”  http://www.justice.gov/olp/pdf/patriot_report_from_the_field0704.pdf. July 2004. Web. 


         Both this guidance outline and report of how the Patriot Act was being implemented and if was successful come from the U.S. Justice Department several years after 9/11.  In them they account for experiences, incidences, and lessons learned from use of the Patriot Act.  There are extensive sections on how to refrain from racial profiling, and targeting of specific individuals, as well as how to soften Americans’ outrage at the encroachment upon their constitutionally protected rights through Amendments like the 4th and the 14th


US Supreme Court Center
http://www.justia.com
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/425/435/case.html


This website holds transcripts of summary judgments made by the US Supreme Court.



Vroom, Cynthia. "The Patriot Act and Academic Freedom." Interview. Watson, Gary. Academic Freedom Forum, 11 June 2003. Web. 8 Nov. 2012.
http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/senate/committees/ucaf/afforum/vroom.pdf.

          This interview showed the point of view of the administration and academic community on the Patriot Act. It also provided real life examples and statistics about foreign students in the U.S. Cynthia Vroom is a member of the Office of the General Council at UCOP. Thing interview provided the contrasting side, the academic, to the political side discussed in other sources.

Walter, Vic and Patel, Avni.  “USA Patriot Act.”  http://usbillofrights.org/patact.html. ABC  News Copyright 2006.  Web.
           
     These activities are conducted in secret with little oversight or public accountability. Many members of Congress who initially favored the measure are now inclined to reject some of its more problematic provisions, but are encountering stiff pressure from the White House and its legislative allies. In response many grass-roots efforts have sprung up across the nation to encourage Congress to take action to protect our freedoms.

             The USA Patriot Act targets the civil liberties of Americans, and effectively stifles domestic political dissent, religious freedom and labor union activism. It also promotes racial profiling as federal government policy.

            It is apparent that whenever this country has been faced with military, political or social crisis, the leading sectors of society have resorted to violating the Bill of Rights and other Constitutional protections in the name of an often dubious notion of national security. The costs of these measures to individuals and classes of victims have been enormous, and have, historically speaking, accomplished little in promoting social cohesion or respect for government institutions. They have only left generations of wounded and embittered people.

            - National Coalition to Repeal the USA Patriot Act.  Savannah, Georgia. 

Wasem, Ruth E. Foreign Students in The United States: Policies and Legislation.
Library of Congress, CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service, 24
Jan. 2003. Web. 10 Nov. 2012.
http://epic.org/privacy/surveillance/spotlight/0905/31146_was.pdf


            This article is another one that looks at the before and after policies of the Patriot Act concerning Foreign Student Monitoring. This article gives specific information about why new policies are needed. Ruth E. Wasem is a specialist in social legislation for the Domestic Social Policy Division. This article provides specific information about the SEVIS system and how the policies of the Patriot Act, concerning Foreign Student Monitoring, were shaped and put into place
.

Weimann, Gabriel. "Cyber Terrorism: How Real Is the Threat?" www.usip.org.
United States Institute of Peace. Web. Accessed 12 November 2012.
http://www.usip.org/files/resources/sr119.pdf

            This report examines the potential threat of cyberterrorism and how psychological, political, and economic forces have promoted the fear of cyberterrorism. It also illustrated how many more cyber investigators there have been since 9/11. Gabriel Weimann is a senior fellow at the United Stated Instutite of Peace and professor of communication at the Unviersity of Haifa, Israel. The report helped me explain how the fear of cyberterrorism has led to a brand new cyber security industry.


White House. The Patriot Act Helps Keep America Safe.  www.whitehouse.gov. The White House, Web. Accessed 12 November 2012. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/06/20050609.html

            This White House press report illustrates how the Patriot Act makes it easier to investigate suspected within the United States. It also explains the tools that the law enforcement will be using to fighting these new kinds of crimes. This White House Press Release was released by the Office of the Press Secretary on June 9, 2005. This press report helped illustrate the dangers of information sharing among terrorists. It also explained the role of Internet providers through the Patriot Act.

YouGov Staff in Economist/YouGov Poll and Politics. “Ten Years After The Patriot Act: America Is Safer, But 45% Say The Act Threatens Civil Liberties.’ http://today.yougov.com/news/2011/11/01/ten-years-after-patriot-act-america-safer-45-say-a/.

          YouGov provided statistics and survey results of how Americans feel about the Patriot Act.  Whether Republican or Democrat, most agreed at the time, ten years after 9/11, that the efforts in the name of the attack had been successful in the fact that there had been no more attacks on the US, but a similar number also felt that the Act goes too far in threatening civil liberties.  This site provided notable contradictions and individual’s conflicting views on the Act.
  
Zalman, Amy. “Cyberterrorism: Latest Threat to National Computer Security?” www.About.com. Web. Accessed 12 November 2012. http://terrorism.about.com/od/issuestrends/a/Cyberterrorism.htm


This webpage describes the immediate aftermath that the attacks of 9/11 had on American national security. It also was concerned with how information could be compromised over security networks. Amy Zalman is a Department of Defense Chair of Information. She has over a decade of experience advising foreign policy, military and intelligence community members, conducting research & development to generate “soft power” approaches to foreign policy, and training U.S. and allied military forces. This webpage allowed me to explain how cyberterrorism was being used as a propaganda tool.  It also gave me a succinct definition of the term cyberterrorism.

No comments:

Post a Comment